Klevv Cras DDR4-3000 Benchmark Results
In benchmarking the Klevv Cras DDR4-3000 16GB memory kit, I used AIDA64’s cache and memory benchmark, SiSoft Sandra Memory Bandwidth and Latency tests, and to simulate real world usage I used Asus RealBench 2.4.I also tried to overclock the Klevv Cras to see how far it would go. But I wasn’t able to push it any further. This is common with higher clocked memory kits, as they are already clocked at their speed limit. However, I was able to tighten its timing down to 15-15-15-30. Did it help? Check out the results below:
Based on the graphs above, the Klevv Cras performed relatively well and was able to outperform the Patriot Viper 4 DDR4, ADATA XPG Z1 DDR4, Avexir Raiden DDR4. The HyperX Fury DDR4 was able to compete with the Klevv Cras DDR4-3000 despite running at a lower clock speed and tighter timings.
Lowering the timings down to 15-15-15-30 slightly improved the Klevv Cras’ performance, but the improvement is insignificant or negligible.
The Cras was also running well with my Z170/Skylake setup. The Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 7 accepted its XPM profile after updating the motherboard’s BIOS. However, the Cras didn’t perform as fast when it was in the X99 system. Nevertheless, this proves that you can still use the Cras together with a Z170 motherboard. In fact, until now I am still using it together with the Z170 motherboard for my Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 7 review.